Boatless Fishing Forum, Reports, Info

November 22nd is coming up, the 50th anniversary is coming up. I have a whole pile of things to say about this particular topic, and a pile of evidence to illustrate clearly that there was not and could not have been a single shooter involved with the Kennedy assassination. But rather than get into that, I'll start things off by saying this: in a court of law today, Lee Harvey Oswald would not be found guilty of murdering the president, no way, no how. The lack of evidence is overwhelming, and the way in which it was handled by the Dallas police, then subsequently the FBI and so on and so on, was piss poor. In a proper court of law, Oswald would be acquitted, because circumstantial evidence is not enough to actually find someone guilty of ANYTHING. O.K...let's have it.

So true it was Bush as the triggerman and Obama was his spotter.

fishnfool73 wrote:So true it was Bush as the triggerman and Obama was his spotter.

Watch the Zapruder film, then make jokes

fishnfool73 wrote:So true it was Bush as the triggerman and Obama was his spotter.

i like what your saying i would like to subscribe to your news letter

Meh, the good always die young... This is why I sometimes sprinkle a bit of a-hole dust into my food to make certain my years are long...

-swordfish

I believed it was Oswald until I was 14 and started shooting. Not long after, I realized the rifle was not capable of making the shots in question in the time frame stated by the zap-film. 2 FBI sharp shooters, the equivalent to our top snipers at that time could not recreate Oswalds performance.

Even the motive is a conspiracy ranging from Viet Nam to the Bay of Pigs. Considering how few people are still alive in and around Washington with any direct knowledge of the assignation, chances are the real story already went to the grave.